Stay in the Know - Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Join a network of more than 90,000 waste and recycling industry professionals. Get the latest news and insights straight to your inbox. Free.
Research Sheds Light on Improved Landfill Methane Emission Measurements
A recent study funded by the Environmental Research & Education Foundation (EREF) tested various methane detection technologies at a closed landfill in Ontario, Canada, comparing their accuracy and effectiveness. The study found that mobile ground-based methods, specifically tracer correlation, provided the most reliable data.
EREF Staff
September 10, 2024
2 Min Read
Jim West / Alamy Stock Photo
New research funded by the Environmental Research & Education Foundation (EREF) has tested the accuracy and effectiveness of multiple methane detection technologies. Conducted by FluxLab at St. Francis Xavier University (Canada), the study offers insights for improving emissions monitoring and mitigation strategies.
A key challenge with landfill emissions measurement has been the difficulty in measuring emissions over a wide area under a range of conditions that are influenced by site topography and meteorological factors. To compare performance, the study deployed different technologies over the same time period at the same site and released methane at a known rate, also referred to as a controlled release, to establish the relative accuracy across methods.
The controlled methane release took place at a closed landfill in Ontario, Canada.
Study Highlights:
Satellite methods could not be validated because the distributed and area-based releases were too small to detect. However, satellite imaging methods are of high priority and will require future controlled studies to validate its performance in a landfill setting.
Aircraft methods had relatively good accuracy but was one of the costliest methods used.
Drone-based methods displayed variability in accuracy and had higher rates of false positives under certain conditions.
Of ground-based methods:
A mobile (truck mounted) method, referred to as tracer Correlation, emerged as the most reliable technique, with consistent and accurate results, reaffirming its role as a benchmark for methane measurement technologies.
Fixed sensors, where technology is mounted in a fixed place in multiple locations in an array format, showed potential but varied greatly depending on sensor type and configuration.
"This research is an important step in improving the precision and reliability of landfill methane detection and quantification methods," said Dr. Bryan Staley, President & CEO of EREF. "The findings are part of larger efforts underway by EREF to bring direct measurement technologies to a place where they can be used with confidence in their reliability and accuracy."
The full report is available on EREF’s website.
About the Author
You May Also Like
Top Stories
