Waste Management, Covanta Kick Off 2017 First Quarter Earnings Season with Revenue Growth

The first two publicly-traded solid waste firms reporting 2017 first quarter earnings each posted earnings growth.

David Bodamer, Executive Director, Content & User Engagement

April 26, 2017

6 Min Read
Waste Management, Covanta Kick Off 2017 First Quarter Earnings Season with Revenue Growth

Houston-based Waste Management saw its revenue rise 8.3 percent in the first quarter that fueled $298 in net income. Meanwhile Covanta Holding Corp., beset by service operations at some plants, managed to eke out a $1 million year-over-year gain in its revenues, although it did post a wider loss of $52 million for the quarter compared to $37 million a year ago.

The two kicked off first quarter earnings season for the solid waste sector.

Waste Management’s Boffo Quarter

Waste Management’s revenues for the first quarter of 2017 were $3.44 billion compared with $3.18 billion for the same 2016 period. Net income for the quarter was $298 million, compared with $258 million, for the first quarter of 2016. On an as-adjusted basis, excluding certain items, net income was $291 million in the first quarter of 2017.

“We are pleased with our strong first quarter results, as we met or exceeded all of our internal targets,” Waste Management President and CEO Jim Fish said in a statement. “On an as-adjusted basis, we saw earnings growth of almost 14 percent. Operating EBITDA grew 8.0 percent due to strength in both our traditional solid waste business and our recycling business, which in turn drove strong first quarter cash flows.) This performance led to us exceeding our internal targets for operating EBITDA and free cash flow.”

Other highlights for the first quarter:

  • Overall revenue increased by 8.3 percent, or $264 million. The revenue increase was driven by positive yield and volume in the company’s collection and disposal business, which contributed $113 million to revenue growth, and significantly higher recycling commodity prices, which contributed $111 million of revenue growth.

  • Core price, which consists of price increases net of rollbacks, plus fees other than the company’s fuel surcharge, was 5.1 percent.

  • Internal revenue growth from yield for collection and disposal operations was 2.0 percent.

  • For both the total company and the traditional solid waste business, internal revenue growth from volume was positive 1.9 percent in the first quarter of 2017, or 1.4 percent after adjusting for one additional workday in the current quarter.

  • Average recycling commodity prices at the company’s recycling facilities were almost 70 percent higher in the first quarter of 2017 than in the prior year period. Results in the Company’s recycling line of business improved by $0.066 per diluted share when compared to the prior year period.

  • As a percent of revenue, operating expenses were 63.0 percent in the first quarter of 2017, as compared to 62.8 percent in the first quarter of 2016. Increased recycling commodity rebates and fuel costs drove the increase in operating expenses as a percent of revenue. Fuel costs were a negative $0.02 per diluted share when compared to the prior year period.

  • Net cash provided by operating activities was $721 million, compared to $732 million in the first quarter of 2016. The first quarter of 2016 included a $67 million benefit from terminating a cross-currency hedge.

  • Free cash flow was $396 million in the first quarter of 2017, compared to $428 million in the first quarter of 2016.

  • Stifel Managing Director Michael E. Hoffman reiterated a buy rating and a $80 target price on Waste Management. “We would describe the 1Q17 results as a strong start to the FY which gives WM comfort in reaffirming its guidance,” Hoffman wrote in a research note. “Recycling guided in February to add $0.04 to 1Q17, ended up stronger at $0.07 but in the reported results are also $0.02 of non-recurring cost for severance. Recycled commodity prices have rolled over hard in April. Fortunately WM had not built higher commodity prices into their FY17 outlook beyond 1Q17. If the trend in volume coupled with 2% yield holds into the seasonal uplift of 2Q and 3Q we would not be surprised to see FCF move from $1.5B to $1.6B, up $50mm to $1.55B to $1.65B.”

Covanta Takes a Hit from Service Outages

Morristown, N.J.,-based Covanta Holding Corp. saw its first quarter year-over-year revenue grow $1 million to $404 million compared to the first quarter of 2016. The company reported a net loss of $52 million—down from a loss of $37 million in 2016.

Adjusted EBITDA was $51 million, down $76 million from a year ago.

According to Covanta, higher waste and service, metals and construction revenue were largely offset by lower energy revenue.

A December 2016 fire at its Dickerson, Md.-plant and one in February at its Fairfax, Va., plant were big contributes to the firm’s unplanned downtime and outages in its energy operations.

"We continued making meaningful progress across our strategic initiatives in the first quarter, nearing completion of construction of the Dublin facility, driving growth in our environmental solutions business, and beginning to process metals at our centralized non-ferrous processing facility," Covanta President and CEO Stephen J. Jones said in a conference call with investors. "The fire and resulting downtime at the Fairfax facility impacted results in the first quarter, but recovery is well underway, with credit to our outstanding team on the ground. We expect to recoup much of the financial impact later in the year as we receive insurance payments. We also took the opportunity to accelerate scheduled outages at a few facilities into the first quarter while these facilities were down for other reasons, which contributed to our completing about 35 percent of our annual planned maintenance expense in Q1. We are very well positioned to post improved year-over-year performance for the balance of the year, and remain squarely on track with our full year outlook."

Here are some other highlights from the firm’s results:

  • Organic growth contributed an overall revenue increase of $14 million.

  • Waste and service revenue grew by $8 million, that included $4 million in its energy-from-waste processing and environmental services revenue of $6 million.

  • Energy revenue decreased by $3 million due to lower production volume related to plant downtime.

  • Recycled metals revenue increased by $3 million driven by improved ferrous market prices and better price realization after metals processing, partially offset by lower volume due to the timing of shipments; and

  • Other revenue increased by $6 million due to construction activity.

  • Operating expenses increased by $26 million to $427 million. The year-over-year net increase included a $33 million increase in same store costs, driven primarily by a $9 million increase in plant maintenance, largely due to the timing and scope of outage activities, and an $18 million increase in other plant operating expenses, including additional costs related to plant downtime, organic growth in the environmental solutions business, and normal wage and benefit escalation. Transactions overall reduced operating expense by $7 million.

  • Adjusted EBITDA declined by $25 million on a year-over-year basis to $51 million, as improved waste and metals pricing were more than offset by facility downtime, impacting both revenue and plant operating expenses, increased scheduled maintenance activity, and the impact of contract transitions and the China asset sale last year.

  • Free Cash Flow decreased by $16 million to $(17) million, primarily as a result of the factors that drove adjusted EBITDA as noted above, partially offset by lower maintenance capital expenditures.

  • Hoffman maintained a hold rating and a $15.50 target price on the company. “As we expected everything but the kitchen sink was thrown into 1Q17. Sales beat us and the street but everything else was worse. CVA did reaffirm guidance with no changes in the broad terms expecting to make up the cost over-runs in 1Q17 with better operating leverage throughout the remainder of the year. CVA does not have a sales issue it has a cost issue and a balance sheet leverage challenge in our view,” Hoffman wrote in a research note.

About the Author

David Bodamer

Executive Director, Content & User Engagement, Waste360

David Bodamer is Executive Director of Content & User Engagement for Waste360 and NREI. Bodamer joined Waste360 in January 2014. He has been with NREI since September 2011 and has been covering the commercial real estate sector since 1999 for Retail Traffic, Commercial Property News and Shopping Centers Today. He also previously worked for Civil Engineering magazine. His writings on real estate have also appeared in REP. and the Wall Street Journal’s online real estate news site. He has won multiple awards from the National Association of Real Estate Editors and is a past finalist for a Jesse H. Neal Award. 

Stay in the Know - Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Join a network of more than 90,000 waste and recycling industry professionals. Get the latest news and insights straight to your inbox. Free.

You May Also Like